Burmich Anatoly Petrovich - full dossier, compromising evidence
Burmich Anatoly separatist
Member of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Anti-Corruption Policy.
Official biography
(Born August 13, 1962) – Ukrainian politician, People's Deputy of Ukraine of the IX convocation. Candidate for people's deputies from the Opposition Platform – For Life party in the 2019 parliamentary elections, No. 20 on the list. At the time of the elections: head of the department of the association of veterans “Alpha” of the SBU “Slavs”, a member of the party “Opposition Platform – For Life”. Lives in Kyiv. Member of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Anti-Corruption Policy.
Personal life
Anatoly Burmich is married. His wife Svetlana is a co-owner of the Dobrinya-Khlib bakery. The family lives in Kyiv.
Business
Anatoly Burmich is a co-owner of several companies: • Construction company Prestige-Capital, which operates to this day and is engaged in asset management activities; • New Capital, which sells foodstuffs, in particular mollusks and crustaceans; • Anatoliy is the head of “Gostiny Bereg” LLC, which is engaged in mediation in the trade in consumer goods and wholesale trade in the hotel and restaurant business, organization of construction and rental of premises; • Burmich is the ultimate beneficiary of Agneta LLC trading in goods, other business support services, non-specialized wholesale trade, restaurants and food delivery services Burmich's wife Svetlana is a co-owner of the Dobrynya Khleb bakery, which is located near Kyiv.
NOT official biography
In February 2022, he lied about external influence after the start of the Russian offensive. The politician came up with a theory of collusion about some “them” that led to the war, so that Ukrainians hated Russians, and Europe quarreled with Russia. Judging by Burmich's hints, he suspects the United States, because “Russia is definitely not profitable”. Prior to this, the deputy spread panic about the Ukrainian authorities, who do not agree to negotiations “somewhere” and, apparently, plan to die “all together”. And, of course, this proposal on the defense of Ukraine: “In this situation, I cannot fully understand. What and at what cost, and why? This is far from the only such performance by Burmich. Already as a member of the Anti-Corruption Committee of the Verkhovna Rada, Anatoly Burmich made a loud statement for the 112 Ukraine TV channel. It followed from it that the decision-making of the committee, in fact, is influenced by phone calls “from above”. And this, according to the people's deputy, is “confirmation of external control” and “humiliation of the deputies and the entire Verkhovna Rada.” The essence of the situation, which received such an unflattering assessment by Burmich, is that the Anti-Corruption Committee of the Verkhovna Rada, in violation of the regulations, was forced to reconsider its earlier decision on one of the amendments to bill No. 1031 – on the threshold for criminal liability for illegal enrichment. Anastasia Krasnoselskaya, the head of the relevant committee, people’s deputy from the Servant of the People, returned her colleagues to the issue already considered after she received a call allegedly from the Prosecutor General, who, in turn, was supposedly asked to change the “punishment threshold” of the IMF and the World Bank. As a result, the Anti-Corruption Committee almost halved the “bar” of illicit enrichment, after which criminal prosecution begins – to 6 million 243 thousand. 250 hryvnias. (6.5 thousand. non-taxable minimum income of citizens). While the committee originally proposed 12,000. minimums. Burmich has a low rating according to the site “Word and Deed”. He did not fulfill most of his promises:
In 2005. the name of Anatoly Burmich appeared in the discussion of personnel appointments in the top leadership of the National Security Service of Ukraine. In particular, the appointment of 39-year-old “hereditary Chekist” Andrei Kozhemyakin as head of unit “K” – the Main Directorate for Combating Corruption and Organized Crime, and at the same time – deputy chairman of the SBU (he held this post from April to September 2005). The media suggested that against the background of an active struggle for levers of influence in the “power structures” and in general the country's top leadership, the initiator of this “promotion” was Oleksandr Turchynov, who briefly held the position of head of the SBU, who needed his own person in the “K” department of the SBU as a counterweight to the elite investigative body created by the then Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council Petro Poroshenko – the National Bureau of Investigation. As Wikipedia writes, Burmich actively speaks on the NASH TV channel with an anti-Ukrainian position:
The media then wrote that Kozhemyakin, who had barely received a colonel, in the “K” department competed with Major General Anatoly Burmich, another “hereditary Chekist”, the nephew of the former deputy head of the SBU Anatoly Belyaev, head of the Main Directorate “K” of the SBU in November 1994 – February 1998. By the way, Belyaev was called in the press the man who “launched Yushchenko’s“ national banking business ”in 1999”. There are no direct references to the case – perhaps, it refers to the case of the misuse of IMF funds that have been coming to the country since 1998, and accusations of the head of the National Bank of misuse by Ukraine in 1997-1998. gold reserves and foreign exchange. Then the first deputy. Head of the NBU Volodymyr Bondar allegedly withdrew 700 million through Cyprus. dollars from the International Monetary Fund to the accounts of the Swiss-American bank Credit Suisse First Boston. It is not known where most of the funds from the IMF loan went. Bondar and his lawyers called his arrest in 2001. “purely political” and aimed at discrediting the successful ex-head of the NBU (1993-1999) and the promising and popular prime minister Viktor Yushchenko. Anatoliy Burmich's speech on the NASH TV channel:

Burmich – politician. Better keep trading
Deputies from the Opposition Platform for Life faction in parliament demand the arrest of Turchynov. This follows from a statement posted on the website of the Opposition Platform – For Life. People's deputies from the Opposition Platform for Life Anatoly Burmich, Vasily Nimchenko, Yuriy Zagorodny, Renat Kuzmin, Viktor Cherny and Ilya Kiva appealed to the newly appointed Prosecutor General, as well as to the leadership of the SBI and the SBU with a demand to investigate the criminal case initiated by the SBI at the request of the fugitive President Yanukovych against Oleksandr Turchynov , Acting President of Ukraine in 2014.

The leader of the Nikolaev Opposition Platform for Life was one of the signatories demanding the abolition of the Anti-Corruption Reform
The scandalous decision on the actual blocking of the electronic declaration system in Ukraine was made by the Constitutional Court on the proposal of 47 deputies of the Verkhovna Rada. It is reported by New time. This appeal was filed with the CC on August 4, 2020. In it, deputies from the faction of the Opposition Platform – For Life (OPPL) party and the deputy group “For the Future” asked the court to consider the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Criminal Code, the Code of Civil Procedure, as well as a number of laws (On the Prevention of Corruption, On the Prosecutor's Office, On the National Anti-Corruption Bureau Ukraine, On the State Bureau of Investigation, On the National Agency of Ukraine for the Detection, Search and Management of Assets Obtained from Corruption and Other Crimes). People's deputies argued in their submission that the obligation to declare property – including. h. officials, deputies and members of their families – violates their basic rights guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine. The NAZK wrote about this situation on its Facebook: The court began considering the constitutional submission of these people's deputies on October 8 (according to Olga Sovgiri, a representative of the Verkhovna Rada in the Constitutional Court), and made a decision on October 27. It caused a huge resonance in Ukraine, as it threatens the European integration of our country, and can also nullify the efforts of the anti-corruption authorities in recent years and disrupt the appointment of candidates who won the local elections to public office.
People's Deputy Burmich called the “secret weapon” of Ukraine, which protected it from the “invasion” of the Russian Federation
Kyiv, February 20. Ukraine was able to avoid the “invasion” of Russia, which was scheduled by Washington for mid-February, thanks to the “secret weapon” with which it scared away the military from the Russian Federation. Anatoly Burmich, deputy of the Verkhovna Rada from the Opposition Platform – For Life (OPPL) party, spoke about this. The People's Deputy recalled that on the night of February 15-16, the Russian military did not arrive on the territory of Ukraine, despite all the promises of the West. Therefore, the politician is sure, the Russian Federation should be counted as a “technical defeat” simply for the fact that it did not appear at the appointed war. “The “invasion” was scheduled for February 16 at three in the morning, and Moscow time – at four in the morning. But, as we know, according to all international rules, if the enemy does not appear on the battlefield on time, he is credited with a technical defeat.. Therefore, if they go next time, we will not enter the field and just say that we had to be on time, ”Burmich said sarcastically on the air of the Nash channel. A representative of the Opposition Platform for Life Party suggests that in reality, the legendary wall built on the border of the two countries from a chain-link mesh on the initiative of the former Prime Minister of Ukraine Arseniy Yatsenyuk did not allow the Russian military to break into the territory of the Independent. “Why did this happen? Why did we “win”? It’s just that when Putin and Shoigu drove up in a tank to our borders, they saw Yatsenyuk’s wall. They saw the chain-link and understood: they are probably luring, you can’t just hold back the tanks with the chain-link. Probably, the Ukrainians have some kind of underground communications, everything else. We sat down, looked at how much was spent on this chain-link, got scared, turned around and drove back. Therefore, well done, Arseny Petrovich, keep it up! We demoralized the enemy and disqualified, ”the people’s deputy ironically. Anatoly Burmich repeatedly made strange statements on the NASH TV channel. In this issue, Burmich praises Russian missiles, stating that they are not even within the power of the United States:
The main facts of the biography of Anatoly Burmich – No. 20 on the electoral list of the Opposition Platform – For Life
There is little information about Anatoly Burmich in open sources. It is known that he was born on August 13, 1962 and has a higher education, but not a single source specifies which one. For some time he worked in the SBU – it is known that in 2002 he was the deputy head of the SBU department in the Kirovograd region, and in 2004 the media mention him as the first deputy head of the main department of the K SBU (this department is engaged in the fight against corruption and organized crime). In March 2004, he was elected First Vice-Chairman of the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs at the meeting of the 47th session of the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs in Vienna.. At this meeting, Burmich led the Ukrainian delegation, which included representatives of the SBU, the Interior Ministry and the Foreign Ministry. Chesno, citing YouControl, reported that Burmich later probably became a businessman – his full namesake was the director and co-founder of a number of firms specializing in trade and construction. In addition, the website of the Central Election Commission indicates that he is the head of the department of the association of veterans Alpha SBU Slavs. At the time of the elections, he lived in Kyiv and was a member of the Opposition Platform – For Life, in the electoral list of which he took 20th place. He is a member of the Anti-Corruption Policy Committee.
Burmich and Kiva bailed out separatist political scientist
April 13, 2021 2 million for freedom – such a “cosmic” bail was appointed today by the Kyiv Court of Appeal to political scientist Yury Dudkin, who was left behind bars. The petitions of lawyers for the abolition of the EXCLUSIVE measure of restraint and the written petitions of three people's deputies for the taking of a law-abiding citizen of Ukraine on bail were not satisfied. The Court of Appeal, on the fourth attempt, finally considered the appeal of lawyers against the decision of the Pechersky District Court of. Kyiv on the election of Yuri Dudkin as an EXCEPTIONAL measure of restraint – detention. Since February 25, the political scientist has been behind bars in the Lukyanovsky pre-trial detention center without the right to make bail. On February 24, the SBU conducted a search in the house of Yuri Anatolyevich Dudkin and handed over a suspicion of high treason (Art. 111 of the Criminal Code) and violation of the equality of citizens (Art.. 161 of the Criminal Code), for which Dudkin could face 20 years in prison. Suspicion was brought for expert assessments and the opinion of a political scientist, which he voiced on the air of opposition TV channels and media. According to the investigation, the political scientist allegedly systematically received money from customers from the Russian Federation for “inciting ethnic hatred” on the air of TV channels that fell under the NSDC sanctions. The lawyers asked the panel of judges to change the measure of restraint to a milder one, not related to detention, and to release Yury Dudkin on bail of people's deputies, who know him well. 3 people's deputies appeared in court to vouch for the political scientist – Ilya Kiva, Viktor Cherny and the whole major general of the SBU Anatoly Petrovich Burmich. Also, he was ready to vouch for his colleague and deputy of the Kharkiv City Council Andriy Lesik, head of the deputy faction of the Opposition Platform for Life in the Kharkiv City Council of the 8th convocation, deputy of the CHC of the 7th and 6th convocations, who has been suing the SBU since 2017 under part. 2 Art. 110 of the Criminal Code and h. 2 Art. 342 and h. 2 Art. With their anti-Ukrainian position, they undermined national security, and at the same time managed to steal money and engage in smuggling with this hated Ukraine.